Monday, 18 November 2013

Creative project Proposal

Group: Isabelle, Jamie & Chloe.

We discussed pro's and con's of genres. It was decided that genres such as RomComs, Comedy and Horror would be hard to portray as they often only appeal to specific audiences and are hard to show in a short clip. Our group agreed that a crime/thriller would be best to use for our scene as it could be made to look realistic.

We sketched a simple idea about a chase scene set in an urban area.

Wednesday, 13 November 2013

'Fish Tank' and 'Sket' analysis

'What are the similarities between 'Fish Tank' and the first part of 'Sket'?'

A visual similarity in both films occurs within many of the shots. For example, Sket consistently shows a wide angle of the Flats Kay and her sister live in. These shots, both day and night, reveal the conjested, enclosed, urban area that these characters live in. They also show Kay walking through to her home, use of a wide angle in particular makes Kay appear small and trapped with the flats that surround her, displaying her as vulnerable and lonely. Fish Tank uses wide angles of Flats to illustrate the poverty stricken, substandard area in which Mia and her family are living in. This introduces the setting of the film to the audience and gives us the expectations for the film, implying that it is going to be gritty and realistic. These shots also appear very drab and depressing in both films, reflecting the general tone of the area and mood of the characters. 

The main characters in each film hold similarities both apparence and personality wise. Although Mia is aggressive and intense, she often shows a quiet side that seems to expose her natural self. Kay is also quiet and timid until she is with the gang of girls, expressing that they both truly are innocent young women. This is further shown by their appearance, Kay and Mia are both natural with simple hair styles and are dressed in casual clothes throughout. This gives them a normalised image, further contributing to the realistic style of each film. To expand, both main characters are relatable and believable as teenage girls, in Kay's room there are close ups of objects such a collage of pictures, reminding the audience that dispite her tough persona, she is still a young girl.

 

Monday, 4 November 2013

Django Essay

Chloe laws – film Studies AS

How does Mise-en-scene and Performance construct meaning and provoke response in the extract?

I have chosen to analyse ‘Django Unchained’ released December 2012. This film falls within the genres of Action, Western and drama and was directed by Quentin Tarantino. The story follows German Bounty Hunter Dr. King Schultz (played by Christoph Waltz) who buys the freedom of a slave, Django (Jamie Foxx) in order to help him hunt Wanted men. Instead he finds himself assisting Django in finding his wife, Broomhilda von Shaft (Kerry Washington) and freeing her also.

The extract I chose from the scene ‘Old Ben’ Shows plantation owner Calvin Candie (played by Leonardo DiCaprio) confronting Django and Schultz about their plan to buy Broomhilda who is enslaved on the forth biggest plantation in Mississippi, ‘Candie Land’. I believe that this scene is suitable as it clearly represents a main theme, power, which is interpreted through the use of Mise-En-Scene and Performance.

The scene is set in a dining room, as indicated by the large table set with napkins, glasses and light candles. It is immediately clear that Candie is extremely wealthy; this is shown by a number of features of Mise-en-scene. For example, the room is decorated with dark, burgundy wallpaper and contains carved, wooden furniture. This gives the idea that Candie likes to be extravagant and show his wealth, which enables him to look superior over others. Also, he is dressed in a dark suit which is buttoned and his tie done up tightly, expressing his professional, serious manor and again reflecting his wealth and position as Plantation owner. To expand, I believe that Quentin Tarantino had decided that this character should wear multiple large rings as DiCaprio constantly uses hand actions in his performance to exaggerate what he’s saying and show his confidence. This not only projects Candie’s fortune to the characters in the scene, but also to the audience, which gives him a pretentious, egotistical Bravado.

In contrast, Django is dressed in a brown coat and black shirt, which appears more casual and neutral in comparison to Candies layered, fitted costume. Schultz, who is posing as an affluent Businessman, is dressed smartly in a grey suit but does not compare to Candies accessorized costume. The three men fit the historical context of pre-civil war, which is communicated by their slicked-back hair, beards and suits. There is also use of makeup to make Candie’s teeth look stained and dirty, which is appropriate for the time period as dental hygiene was poor.

Interestingly, there is a large, marble statue of two fighters displayed behind Candie. Earlier in the film we learn that Candie is an enthusiast for the sport Mandingo Fighting. We see the true brutality of this when Candie is first introduced, as he is engrossed in a fight between two men who fight to the death. I believe that this statue is a representation of Candies violent, cruel nature as it glorifies him as a ‘trainer’; it is an exhibit of his bestiality used to intimidate others.

In this scene, Leonardo DiCaprio uses numerous props to give a memorable and theatrical performance. He begins by slowly taking out a saw and waving it as he talks, his quiet, calm tone of voice juxtaposes his actions and appears sinister. This also builds suspense as the audience are expecting DiCaprio to suddenly do something with this prop. He continues by sawing the ‘skull of old Ben’ to which Schultz is shown looking uncomfortable as he turns to Django for reassurance. In this moment the room is quiet as the sound of crickets can be heard in the distance, this amplifies the clanging of Candies instruments and cracking of the skull, putting the audience in to this tense, intimate moment as if they are there.

A key moment is when Candie addresses Django only, referring to him as ‘bright boy’; he explains that his skull would have ‘the same three dimples as Old Ben’. He does this dramatically as he often pauses to point at objects such as the Hammer and skull to exaggerate what he’s saying. He uses this tool as if he is educating Django and belittles him by speaking slowly as if he doesn’t understand.  The camera follows this prop validating Candies control of the conversation and highlighting the gruesome imagery of the Hammer and skull.  He also makes a violent remark by saying “if I took this Hammer here…and I bashed in your skull with, you would have the same three dimples, in the same place, as Old Ben”. Candies casual, calm attitude towards this threat reveals the true barbaric nature of his character as it is said with true intention and purpose.


I believe that Candies charade is to subdue Django, as he is now aware that he posses Django’s wife Broomhilda, who he has travelled far to find. He also holds full authority as Django and Schultz are in his plantation and want his ‘property’ Broomhilda. Candie uses this to his advantage, knowing that Django and Schultz will obey him in fear of loosing Broomhilda. Overall, Candie believes that he overpowers Django purely due to race. Although his brutal punishments on slaves are shown before, I feel that what he talks about in this scene truly portrays his incurable, deluded attitude towards slaves. For example, he talks about how the skull of old Ben, a slave, has three dimples in the skull that all Africans would have. He continues to say that “these three dimples exist in the area of the skull most associated with, civility” implying that slaves were made to politely obey others and trying to excuse what himself and generations of his family have been doing by owning plantations run by slaves.  I feel that Quentin Tarantino has created this character as a reflection of some people and their attitudes today as a harsh reality of what some people still believe.